Collaboration “can save forests and billions”

Report this content

International scientists, including Liverpool John Moores University’s Professor Serge Wich, have urged the three nations who share the Asian island of Borneo to collaborate more closely to save their endangered wildlife and meet development goals.

By coordinating conservation and development efforts as well as reforming land-use, Malaysia, Indonesia and Brunei could retain up to half of the land of Borneo as forests, protect elephant and orangutan habitats, reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 50 per cent, and possibly significantly reduce the opportunity costs by billions of dollars.

The study, published in the scientific journal Nature Communications, is led by researchers at the ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CEED).

It reveals that the governments’ current land-use plans are inadequate, and will fall significantly short of meeting their conservation goals.

The researchers found that integrated planning between the three nations, including coordinating conservation and development plans, and allowing changes to existing land-use allocations, will achieve substantial savings while requiring less land for protected areas. It will also deliver the greatest area for reduced impact logging – logging practices that are better for the environment.

Professor Serge Wich from the LJMU School of Natural Sciences and Psychology said:

"This study highlights that countries should try to work together to reach their development and conservation targets. This is an important result and hopefully future studies will assess this for other countries where conservation efforts are ideally coordinated between countries. For great apes it would be very valuable to conduct similar studies in Africa where we see a surge in large-scale oil-palm development, which could easily lead to many of the negative biodiversity outcomes as we have seen in Borneo. Careful planning can hopefully mitigate those negative impacts as indicated for Borneo in this study."

“Borneo is the world’s third largest island – it harbours over 14,000 plant species and 1,600 land animals,” said lead author Ms Rebecca Runting of CEED and The University of Queensland (UQ). “These tropical forests regulate regional and global climate and provide food and income to millions of people.”

Ms Runting explains that the high rates of forest conversion and degradation over previous decades have prompted the three nations to pledge to protect their natural resources, including maintaining between 45 and 75 per cent of the land area of Borneo as forests. At the same time, Malaysia and Indonesia have planned to greatly expand the area of oil palm and timber plantations.

“The integrated planning scenario explores land-use planning for the entire island, rather than each state operating in isolation,” said Dr Kerrie Wilson of CEED and UQ. “Our study reveals that it is much more cost-effective than the current ‘business-as-usual’ scenario, and also comes closest to meeting the three countries’ conservation targets.”

Dr Erik Meijaard of CEED and the Borneo Futures initiative says the integrated planning approach also requires the protection of 8.6 million hectares of land currently designated for logging, 4.3 million hectares of unplanted oil-palm land and 1.3 million hectares of unplanted industrial timber land.

“Despite the substantial re-allocation of land-uses, the costs to each state remain similar to the current approach,” he said. “Companies, however, have paid for licenses on those lands and won’t easily give them up.

“In such cases, incentives and subsidies will be vital, and governments could convince companies that other lands are better suited for plantation development, and exchange those lands with them.”

The team also found that the Heart of Borneo initiative, which aims to manage 20 million hectares of the island’s mountain areas, is less cost-efficient than the integrated planning approach. This is because while the initiative will keep much of the uplands as forests, much of the lowlands, where orangutans and elephants mainly live, will be cleared.

The Borneo-wide targets would need to be fully supported by all three of the governments who share Borneo, says co-author Dr Marc Ancrenaz of the Kinabatangan Orang-utan Conservation Programme (HUTAN) and Borneo Futures.

“To ensure that the best development and conservation plans are implemented in each national jurisdiction, we recommend a binding agreement,” he says.

“It could include joint targets to protect forests, specifying the type and location of land for oil palm and other plantations, and exchanging knowledge.”

This is where conservationists and governments have to work together, Dr Ancrenaz says: “We won’t be able to save all the forests, wildlife and plants, but we can minimise the negative impacts that developments have on them.

“Sharing information between different nations and sectors will allow us to better identify the priority areas and the species that we need to save. Not only could this approach reach conservation targets, it could also lead to better development for the nations and save a significant amount of money.”

Dr Meijaard adds that a Borneo-wide collaboration is not a new idea: “The famous peace conference in central Kalimantan in 1894 to tackle warfare, slavery and head-taking is an early example of how these nations have worked together.

“The meetings took four months, but resulted in a significant decrease in inter-tribal wars and raids. Let’s hope that leaders of Borneo recognise the benefit of working together to develop the island’s resources, while maintaining its many local and international benefits.”

The study “Alternative futures for Borneo show the value of integrating economic and conservation targets across borders” by Rebecca K. Runting, Erik Meijaard, Nicola K. Abram, Jessie A. Wells, David L.A. Gaveau, Marc Ancrenaz, Hugh P. Possingham, Serge A. Wich, Fitrian Ardiansyah, Melvin T. Gumal, Laurentius N. Ambu and Kerrie A. Wilson is published in Nature Communications. See: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7819

CEED is the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions. CEED’s research tackles key gaps in environmental decision making, monitoring and adaptive management.

Interview contact details:

Professor Serge Wich   s.a.wich@ljmu.ac.uk 

LJMU Press Officer Clare Coombes  0151 231 3004  press@ljmu.ac.uk

Founded in 1825, LJMU is a modern civic university delivering impactful research and scholarship that form the foundation for its interaction with industry, business and the community. The University has around 24,000 students, recruited from over 100 countries, who are enrolled on a wide range of undergraduate, postgraduate taught and research degrees as well as continuing professional development programmes. 

LJMU is one of the UK’s leading research active contemporary universities, with world-leading and internationally recognised research taking place across the institution. It also continues to be one of the UK’s leading higher education institutions for its interaction with business and the community. This interaction informs both teaching and research at the University and impacts positively on graduate employability, with 95% of graduates being in work or further study within six months of leaving the University.

Media

Media

Quotes

This study highlights that countries should try to work together to reach their development and conservation targets. This is an important result and hopefully future studies will assess this for other countries where conservation efforts are ideally coordinated between countries. For great apes it would be very valuable to conduct similar studies in Africa where we see a surge in large-scale oil-palm development, which could easily lead to many of the negative biodiversity outcomes as we have seen in Borneo. Careful planning can hopefully mitigate those negative impacts as indicated for Borneo in this study.
Professor Serge Wich